Skip to content

Axonio vs Zep.

A context platform for agents built around a temporal knowledge graph (Graphiti). Here is where each one fits, and where Axonio goes further.

Axonio compared with Zep
CapabilityAxonioZep
What it isMemory engine + hosted MCP serverManaged context platform
Open-source coreMITGraphiti framework is open source; platform is managed
Self-hostingSame engine as the cloudGraphiti framework; platform via enterprise options
Vector retrievalHybrid vector + full-text + graphHybrid search over the graph
Knowledge graphCross-source, time-awareTemporal knowledge graph
Fork / diff / merge memoryZero-copy fork, diff, merge, discardNot documented
MCP serverHosted + local, 44 toolsGraphiti MCP server
Embedded / on-deviceOffline, syncs when connectedServer-based
Importers from other storesMem0, Zep, Pinecone + 6 moreNot documented

From Zep’s public documentation, last reviewed September 2026. Out of date? Tell us.

Choose Zep if
  • Your core need is enterprise context assembled from many business systems.
  • You want a managed platform with a temporal graph as the primary model.
Choose Axonio if
  • You need branchable memory for evaluations, policy tests or rollbacks.
  • You want to self-host or embed the full engine, not only the graph framework.
  • You want vector, full-text and graph recall in one query from one store.
FAQ

Axonio or Zep?

Is Axonio a Zep alternative?

Yes, for agent memory. Zep is a context platform for agents built around a temporal knowledge graph (Graphiti). Axonio is an open-source memory engine with a hosted MCP server, a knowledge graph and Git-style branching of memory.

What does Axonio have that Zep doesn’t document?

Fork, diff and merge of an agent’s memory. You can test a policy or a risky plan on a branch and merge or discard it without touching production memory.

Can I import my Zep data?

Yes. The Zep importer reads your existing data, shows a preview and maps fields automatically. See the Zep migration guide.

Give your agents a memory they can branch.